Select Page

Beijing could steal as much foreign technology and intellectual property as it can as foreign businesses flee the country.
It appears that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) knows that China’s heyday as the world’s manufacturing hub will be coming to an end sooner rather than later. That may explain its new policy, which enables and promotes the blatant intellectual property (IP) theft from its foreign partners.

What the New Law Says

In March, the Regulations on the Implementation of the Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law granted China broad powers to seize and take ownership of foreign-owned assets, including IP rights. The legal cover used by the CCP is outlined in Article 7 of the law, which allows for the confiscation of property held by companies that Beijing has identified as participating in or assisting in drafting sanctions against China.

This new law is an update to the Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law (AFSL), enacted in June 2021. That law allowed Beijing to respond against people or companies that have either been shown to have directly or indirectly participated in foreign efforts to target China with restrictive measures. Approved responses included banning travel visas for individuals, restricting businesses, or even freezing assets of entities under suspicion.

Under the new and improved law of 2025, the term “assets” is clarified, if not greatly expanded. It includes property such as “cash, bills, bank deposits, securities, fund shares, equity, intellectual property rights, accounts receivable, and other property.”

In short, Article 7 gives the Chinese authorities the right to seize or freeze foreign IP of almost any kind. That list includes any patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets that are held in China.

What’s more, the law significantly lowers the bar for the Chinese authorities so that even minor or indirect involvement—a vague term, to be sure—in foreign sanctions drafting or implementation will be enough to have your money, stock account, real estate portfolio, corporate equity, and, yes, intellectual property confiscated by the CCP.

As noted above, such behavior is hardly the kind one would expect from a country seeking to keep foreign companies or even attract them to its shores.

What the New Law Really Means

In other words, the new law is intended to be punitive to any company that wants to curb the Chinese regime’s illegal dumping practices in multiple industries, including solar and wind power, its legendary levels of IP theft—amounting to up to $600 billion per year from the United States alone—and other adversarial trading tactics that are intended destroy competition and benefit the regime. Furthermore, foreign individuals, companies, or organizations have no right to appeal. All decisions are final.

The law applies to multiple industrial sectors, including software, biotech, consumer goods, and entertainment. The impact on those companies under suspicion can be fatal.

What company or individual can survive financially if all its trade secrets, market advantages, and financial, real estate, and capital equipment assets are suddenly frozen or confiscated, leaving the company or individual under suspicion with nothing?

Finally, the new law also enables—if not encourages—Chinese companies and even individuals to file lawsuits against foreign entities that have been identified as partaking in sanctions or other indirect and often unprovable restrictive behavior against China. Chinese plaintiffs can be awarded compensation from the company or person found to be guilty. This aspect of the law provides individuals with the opportunity to easily sue and be awarded damages from foreign companies, which could trigger an avalanche of legal actions against them by Chinese individuals, especially given the deteriorating economic conditions.

A New Era: Institutionalizing IP Theft, Forced Technology Transfers

This new law shouldn’t surprise anyone familiar with doing business with China. As noted, IP and technology theft have been going on in China for decades. Most companies view it as a cost of doing business and making huge profits.

However, by making it an explicit policy, the law becomes just another part of a much larger geopolitical picture. The technology competition between the United States and China in areas such as artificial intelligence, robotics, bioengineering, and other emerging fields is intense. The same could be for Europe, Japan, South Korea, and other advanced, capitalist countries.

Plus, given the fact that the biggest tech companies in the world—such as Tesla, Apple, and Microsoft—are heavily invested in China and their supply chains rely on China-based factories, they face the real possibility of being targeted and losing their entire operations. This includes everything from intellectual property to manufacturing facilities to retail stores, all of which could be subject to confiscation by the Chinese authorities.

In other words, the new law allows the CCP to make mass forced technology and ownership transfers quickly and irrevocably. That goes well beyond individual or company concerns to encompass strategic economic and geopolitical concerns.

The Law Is a Response to US Trade Policy, Influence

The threat of confiscating trillions of dollars’ worth of U.S. businesses and any other foreign-owned companies is a threat that can’t be ignored. The CCP is making those companies pawns in its grander economic and geopolitical struggle with the Trump administration. In other words, they’re now bargaining chips in Beijing’s negotiations to moderate U.S.-imposed sanctions and tariffs.

How will Beijing leverage the threat of mass confiscation of U.S. or Western IP and other property based in China?

That remains to be seen. However, Chinese companies, such as Huawei and Xiaomi, have protected themselves against IP theft lawsuits outside of China by citing court rulings in Chinese courts, which tend to view foreign IP theft lawsuits as efforts to contain China.

Beijing’s Risk Calculus

This new law is one more very good reason for foreign companies to diversify their supply chains and relocate their IP and assets out of China. Clearly, the CCP anticipated this response, so why enact such a law?

One may conclude that the CCP sees that neither the new U.S. policies nor the long-term trend of companies leaving China will change soon and, therefore, has decided to fight the Trump administration with the means at its disposal.

Chinese officials must also know that as time passes and more companies leave China, their ability to seize IP and property diminishes, yet they have decided that it was worth the risk.

How long will it be before the CCP takes that first big step of confiscating Tesla or Apple assets?

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)
GLA NEWS
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com