Select Page

Iran’s military command issued a regional port security warning as Washington moves to restrict Iranian shipping after failed peace talks in Pakistan.

Iran Issues New Threat Following Trump’s Hormuz Blockade AnnouncementIran’s military leadership warned on April 13 that no port in the Persian Gulf or Gulf of Oman would remain secure if the United States proceeds with a naval blockade targeting Iranian shipping, raising the risk of a wider maritime confrontation across key regional waterways.

In a statement carried by state-linked media, the spokesperson for the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters said maritime security in the region must apply to all or to none, warning that any threat to Iranian ports would trigger reciprocal measures.

“Security in the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman is either for everyone or for no one,” said the spokesperson, Lt. Col. Ebrahim Zolfaqari, according to a post on X by Iranian state broadcaster IRIB. “If Iran’s ports are threatened, no port in the region will be safe.”

US Blockade Plans Draw Iranian Response

The Iranian warning came in response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s announcement that the U.S. Navy would begin blockading maritime traffic linked to Iran after high-stakes nuclear and ceasefire negotiations in Islamabad ended without a deal.

Trump said on April 12 that U.S. forces would “seek and interdict every vessel in International Waters that has paid a toll to Iran” and would prevent ships from entering or leaving the Strait of Hormuz.

“No one who pays an illegal toll will have safe passage on the high seas,” Trump added.

U.S. Central Command later clarified that the blockade—set to begin on April 13 at 10 a.m. ET—would apply specifically to vessels entering or exiting Iranian ports, not to broader commercial traffic moving through the strait.

Iran has described the move as an unlawful restriction on international waters and warned of wider consequences.

Zolfaqari described the U.S. actions as “piracy” and said Tehran would continue to enforce its own rules governing passage through the Strait of Hormuz, including barring vessels affiliated with “enemy forces” while allowing others to transit under Iranian regulations, according to a Telegram post from Iran’s semi-official Mehr News Agency.

Tankers sail in the Gulf, near the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from northern Ras al-Khaimah, near the border with Oman’s Musandam governance, amid the U.S.–Israeli conflict with Iran, in the United Arab Emirates on March 11, 2026. (Reuters)
Tankers sail in the Gulf, near the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from northern Ras al-Khaimah, near the border with Oman’s Musandam governance, amid the U.S.–Israeli conflict with Iran, in the United Arab Emirates on March 11, 2026. Reuters

Zolfaqari’s statement also indicated that Iran intends to establish a “permanent mechanism” to control access to the strait even after the current conflict ends.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has warned that military vessels attempting to pass through the strait would face a “firm response,” hinting at the possibility of direct confrontation between U.S. and Iranian forces in the narrow waterway.

Risk of Broader Maritime Disruption

The Strait of Hormuz, which connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman, handles roughly one-fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas flows, making it one of the most strategically sensitive shipping lanes in the world.

Iran’s latest warning suggested the conflict could expand beyond Hormuz to other critical maritime routes, including ports across the Gulf and potentially the Bab el-Mandeb Strait at the southern entrance to the Red Sea, a vital corridor for shipping between Europe and Asia.

Iran-allied Houthis in nearby Yemen have threatened to target the Bab el-Mandeb strait, a move that could add to pressure on regional shipping routes and energy infrastructure linked to Saudi Arabia and other Gulf producers.

While it assesses the threat level in the Strait of Hormuz as “critical,” the UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) said in an April 12 advisory update that the Bab el-Mandeb Strait remains at a “moderate” threat level.

“While regional tensions and Houthi rhetoric toward commercial shipping continue, there have been no confirmed incidents affecting maritime traffic in the area,” UKMTO said.

Iranian Navy Commander Rear Adm. Shahram Irani said Tehran was closely monitoring U.S. military movements in the region and dismissed Washington’s blockade threat as ineffective, according to Iran’s semi-official Tasnim News Agency.

The escalating rhetoric follows weeks of conflict that began on Feb. 28 with U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets, triggering retaliatory actions and widespread disruption to shipping and energy markets.

Emirati Minister of Industry Ahmed Al Jaber said in a post on X that as of April 12, hundreds of commercial vessels remained stranded in or near the Strait of Hormuz, including nearly 400 oil tankers.

A ship believed to be the French Navy’s (Marine Nationale) FS Jacques Chevalier heads toward the Bab-el-Mandeb strait in Tadjoura, Djibouti, on Jan. 20, 2024. Luke Dray/Getty Images

UKMTO said in its April 12 advisory that just four vessels had transited the Strait of Hormuz in the previous 24-hour period, down from an average of 138 per day prior to the outbreak of hostilities.

Two oil tankers linked to Iran exited the Gulf via the strait on April 13 ahead of the planned U.S. blockade, according to shipping data from Kpler and LSEG.

The tanker Auroura is laden with Iranian oil products while the New Future tanker is carrying diesel loaded from the Hamriyah port in the United Arab Emirates, Kpler data showed.

Trump’s blockade announcement came shortly after U.S. Vice President JD Vance said that negotiations with Iranian officials in Pakistan had failed to produce a breakthrough, particularly on Tehran’s nuclear program.

“The simple question is, do we see a fundamental commitment … not to develop a nuclear weapon,” Vance said after the talks. “We haven’t seen that yet.”
In February, the International Atomic Energy Agency said Iran had “produced and accumulated uranium enriched up to 60 percent U-235, of which it had accumulated 440.9 kg [about 970 pounds] by the time of the military attacks in mid-June 2025.”

Energy Market Risk

Oil markets have reacted sharply to the unfolding crisis, with prices rising amid fears of prolonged supply disruptions.

U.S. gasoline prices have climbed significantly since the start of the conflict, reflecting the global ripple effects of instability in the Gulf. Oil prices jumped after the U.S. threat to block Iranian ports, with Brent crude futures trading at about the $102.6 mark as of 6:32 a.m. ET, on the ICE exchange in Europe, per TradingView data.

Stock market numbers are displayed as traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on April 2, 2026. (Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)Stock market numbers are displayed as traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on April 2, 2026. Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

With both sides signaling readiness to escalate and no immediate diplomatic breakthrough in sight, analysts say the confrontation risks evolving into a prolonged crisis with implications for energy markets.

“The market is now largely back to conditions before the ceasefire, except now the U.S. will block the remaining up to (2 million barrels) Iranian-linked flows through the Strait of Hormuz as well,” MST Marquee analyst Saul Kavonic said.

“The key remaining question is if the U.S. renews strikes on Iran, raising the risk of strikes on energy infrastructure across the region which could have a further lasting impact beyond the duration of the war.”

Visited 4 times, 1 visit(s) today
GLA NEWS