In 2024-2025 term, Supremes ‘handed down historic conservative victories in the culture war’

As the United States Supreme Court gears up to begin its next term, it’s important to remember that President Trump is on a winning streak the likes of which we haven’t seen in generations.
In fact, while the legacy media idolize rogue judges who throw up roadblocks to President Trump’s agenda at every turn and amplify perceived losses, what they don’t want you to realize is that when the dust settles, Trump wins most of the time on the ultimate decision.
And remember, we’re only nine months in.
As the 2025-26 term begins, it is important to remember that the 2024-25 Supreme Court term was one of the most successful for legal conservatives in many decades.
The court handed down historic conservative victories in the culture war, including allowing states to remove Planned Parenthood from their Medicaid providers; upholding states’ prerogatives to ban gender-related surgeries on minors; and protecting parental rights against LGBTQ propaganda in the classroom.
Further, the court finally reined in activist judges, preventing them from issuing nationwide injunctions that allowed them to legislate for the entire country from the bench and were designed to thwart the president’s agenda which the people elected him to enact.
The 2024-25 term built on important wins achieved during Trump’s first administration, where he was able to successfully fill the federal judiciary and the Supreme Court with originalist and textualist jurists, who adhere to the rule of law and the Constitution rather than a rigid ideology that pre-determines cases based on outcomes and parties.
Trump’s remaking of the judiciary during his first administration continued to rack up wins even during the Biden administration, when the Supreme Court returned abortion regulation to the states (Dobbs 2022), ended the practice of basing college admissions on racial preferences (Students for Fair Admissions 2023), and overturned decades of unaccountable, bureaucratic rulemaking (Loper Bright 2024).
Imagine for a second that Donald Trump had not been elected in 2016. None of these decisions would have been decided according to the Constitution, and Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden would have been able to potentially add four or five radical judges to the court, versus the three leftist activists now on the wrong side of virtually every major ruling.
Even the legacy media acknowledges that the White House “has won 18 times at the Supreme Court since Trump took office and is on a 15-case winning run.” Furthermore, “the Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to weigh in on an emergency basis 28 times. … It has lost only two.”
One of those losses called for the return to the U.S. of deported illegal immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia. In the end, however, the “Maryland Man” appears to be facing deportation to the tiny African country of Eswatini.
There are indications of more victories to come, such as the Sept. 8 stay by the Supreme Court of a lower court ruling barring Trump from dismissing executive branch employees, and an announcement that the court will hear arguments as to Trump’s firing authority (and whether to overturn New-Deal era decision Humphrey’s Executor) during this upcoming term.
The U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals – just below the Supreme Court – are also consistently delivering victories for Trump, constitutional conservatives who supported him, and the rule of law.
The Fourth Circuit, now a court usually delivering progressive, policy-driven decisions, just weighed into the discussion over federal firings with a 2-1 victory for Trump, ruling that Democrat-led states could not pursue lawsuits challenging the dismissal of nearly 25,000 probationary federal employees.
Trump was able to reshape the Ninth Circuit – once widely referred to as the “Ninth Circus” because it was so reliably left-wing – during his first term, such that when California Gov. Gavin Newsom tried to reclaim control of the state’s National Guard during violent protests in L.A., District Judge Charles Breyer, who tried to hand his governor a victory, was overturned in embarrassing fashion.
Still early in his second term, Trump is building on his circuit court picks. Over the summer, the Senate confirmed to the Sixth Circuit Whitney Hermandorfer, who clerked for Justices Alito and Barrett, and then-Judge Kavanaugh; and added Emil Bove to the Third Circuit, whose nomination had Cory Booker so angry he embarrassed his Democrat colleagues and was chided on the Senate floor.
Now that the Senate is clearing the backlog of Democratic nomination holdups, expect more excellent judicial nominees to be confirmed.
But President Trump is even beginning to see victories in federal district courts. FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok just lost his lawsuit against the Department of Justice and the FBI after an Obama appointee, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Amy Berman Jackson, ruled that Strzok’s firing in the wake of his text scandal claiming he could prevent Donald Trump from becoming president was not a violation of his First Amendment rights.
President Trump promised more winning during his second term, and it’s a promise he has kept so far, even as the left tries to weaponize the court system against him.