A legal analysis of the political agenda adopted by James Boasberg, the anti-Trump judge working in the courts system in Washington, D.C., reveals how he abandoned his role as a “judge” and made himself “like a foreign diplomat” by “attempting to influence how the Trump administration conducted foreign affairs.”

That’s according to an appeals court judge whose comments were cited by Thomas Jipping, senior legal fellow in the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at the Heritage Foundation, and John Osorio, a research associate, online.

The fight is over President Donald Trump’s agenda to secure American borders and remove illegal alien criminals invited in by the open borders policies of Joe Biden during his years in the White House.

Boasberg has fought Trump’s agenda, even to the point of trying to enforce his own order that the U.S. Supreme Court overturned.

He was the judge who even tried to order Trump to tell airplanes carrying illegal alien criminals, that already had left American airspace, to return to the U.S. with the criminals.

The analysis notes Trump is backed by the Constitution, which gives him authority over matters involving international relations, the Alien Enemies Act that allows the president to apprehend and remove the natives, citizens, or subjects of a hostile foreign government if that government attempts or threatens an ‘invasion or predatory incursion’ against the U.S. and the Immigration and Nationality Act that lets the secretary of state designate as Foreign Terrorist Organizations groups that engage in terrorist activity and threaten the safety of Americans or the United States.

The drama developed over recent months as State designated eight transnational gangs and cartels FTOs, including Tren de Aragua, a Venezuelan prison gang, Trump then cited the AEA and TdA’s links to the “narco-terrorism” of regime chief Nicolas Maduro.

The administration took into custody dozens of TdA agents, with deportation plans to El Salvador.

Their lawyers went to Boasberg and called for him to protect their criminal clients.

On that day, “between 5:25 and 5:45 p.m., two flights with a total of 137 suspected TdA members left Texas, bound first for Honduras and then El Salvador. At 7:25 p.m., Boasberg certified a class of all individuals covered by the proclamation and issued a TRO prohibiting the government from ‘removing’ them for 14 days. On Mar. 28, he extended that order for another 14 days,” the analysis said.

The Supreme Court then vacated both of his orders, prompting Boasberg to launch contempt proceedings against the government because he claimed “removing” meant turning over custody to another government, which actually happened after his order and the planes landed.

“Boasberg’s shocking ultimatum to the executive branch was this: Return the deportees to U.S. soil or identify the officials who ordered the deportation so they could be prosecuted. He set a hard deadline of Apr. 23,” the analysis confirmed.

“But wait—hadn’t the Supreme Court already vacate Boasberg’s TRO? How can someone disobey an order that, in effect, Boasberg had no authority to issue?”

Soon the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit was ruling.

Judges Gregory Katsas and Neomi Rao sided with the government.

Rao took the high road, to Boasberg’s low, warning he was intruding “upon the powers committed to the Executive Branch.”

“This case is highly unusual, and I have found no other like it, perhaps because no district court has threatened criminal contempt against Executive Branch officials as a backdoor to coercing compliance with an order that has been vacated by the Supreme Court,” she said.

Boasberg’s politics, she wrote, were “untenable” and described his order “coercive.”

On social media, he said, “People are shocked by what is going on with the Court System.”

“I was elected for many reasons, but a principal one was LAW AND ORDER, a big part of which is QUICKLY removing a vast Criminal Network of individuals, who came into our Country through the Crooked Joe Biden Open Borders Policy!