New York Attorney General Letitia James, famous for her lawfare agenda against President Donald Trump, has been revealed to be caught up in yet another federal investigation.

She’s already under indictment for alleged mortgage fraud involving claims she bought a house and claimed it was her residence to get a better interest rate, then rented it out. Further, one of her mortgage application documents allegedly listed her father as her “spouse.”

She had created a massive “fraud” claim against Trump and his companies, and with the help of a leftist judge, obtained a massive half billion dollar penalty against Trump, a penalty that was thrown out by an appeals court for being unconstitutional.

Now a report at the Daily Caller News Foundation explains a judge has unsealed details about her fight against a federal criminal probe for alleged “selective enforcement.”

Those allegations involve her lawfare against Trump, his business operations, and even a separate case involving the National Rifle Association.

“James’s effort to block subpoenas issued by the Department of Justice (DOJ) touches ‘on matters of national concern, with implications that stretch well beyond this action,'” Judge Lorna Schofield wrote in her order making the filings public.

“Unsealing this action is not only permissible but compelled,” the judge wrote. “One simple fact drives this conclusion: the information at issue is not secret.”

Just weeks ago, it was revealed acting U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of New York John A. Sarcone III subpoenaed documents concerning James’s civil fraud case against Trump and his company, along with her case against the National Rifle Association.

James has claimed that an investigation of her lawfare agenda actually is “retaliation” against her.

Her lawyers have told the court that she is being targeted by Trump administration over her lawfare agenda against him.

She already faces two charges for alleged bank fraud and false statements in a case in Virginia.

WND previously reported she had claimed she is not guilty of mortgage fraud but in a commentary Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett said she incriminated herself and the charges appear to be justified.

“She’ll also claim, of course, ‘Oh, it’s a big misunderstanding, paperwork snafu, somebody else is to blame.’ But under her own stated standard in the Trump case, she declared that is never an excuse. So she’s hoisted on her own petard, as Shakespeare would say in Hamlet,” Jarrett said.

Jarrett said that the case against James rests squarely on the paperwork she personally executed.

“It’s a pretty serious case against her, Sean. You cannot claim an occupied residence, get a lower mortgage rate, and then rent it out. You’re cheating the lender by lying, and James actually incriminated herself. Both her mortgage and her insurance documents said she occupied it, but on an IRS records form she admitted it was purely a rental with zero personal occupancy,” Jarrett said.

“Predictably, today she just whined that the law is being weaponized against her. Spare me the moral outrage. It was phony. She was the one who campaigned on the promise to get Trump, then conjured up that ludicrous case only to get slapped down by the appellate court in an epic embarrassment,” Jarrett said. “I think he or she’s going to do exactly what James Comey is doing, claim selective, vindictive prosecution, try to get the case dismissed, avoid trial entirely. But, you know, under the law the burden shifts to her to prove by clear evidence that the case has an unjustifiable motive.”

It was the Federal Housing Finance Agency that referred James to the Justice Department for the alleged crimes.