Select Page


An exterior view of the Supreme Court on June 20, 2024 in Washington, DC. The Supreme Court is about to issue rulings on a variety of high profile cases dealing with abortion rights, gun rights, and former President Donald Trump’s immunity claim, putting the court at the center of many hot political topics during an election year. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

OAN Staff James Meyers
2:43 PM – Tuesday, May 27, 2025

The Supreme Court declined to hear a case on Tuesday involving a student’s appeal after his school district prohibited him from wearing a T-shirt that read, “There are only two genders.”

The two Conservative judges on the high court Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito claimed they would have reviewed the student’s case in Middleborough, Massachusetts, stating that the lower courts were not following the First Amendment. 

Advertisement

“If a school sees fit to instruct students of a certain age on a social issue like LGBTQ+ rights or gender identity, then the school must tolerate dissenting student speech on those issues,” wrote Alito and Thomas.

However, the Lower courts held that the school’s ban doesn’t conflict with the SupremeCourt’s 1969 decision, “Tinker v. Des Moines,” which allowed students to wear armbands protesting the Vietnam War, ruling that they don’t “shed their constitutional rights” when they enter “the schoolhouse gate.”

Christopher and Susan Morrison, who are guardians of the student, who was not named because of being a minor, used the old case as they sued the school district in 2023 for not allowing the student to wear the shirt. 

“It gives schools a blank check to suppress unpopular political or religious views, allows censorship based on ‘negative psychological impact’ or ideological offense, rejects a public school’s duty to inculcate tolerance, and lowers free-speech protection for expression that schools say implicates ‘characteristics of personal identity’ in an ‘assertedly demeaning’ way,” the lawsuit states. 

“This flouts Tinker and turns the First Amendment on its head.” 

Meanwhile, the student is represented by Alliance Defending Freedom, which is a Christian conservative legal firm that represents several cases when it comes to gender that have been taken up by the Supreme Court. 

However, the school district’s attorneys said the group “attempts to rewrite the facts” and doesn’t focus on the affidavits submitted by school administrators at Nichols Middle School (NMS), which provide “crucial context” showing why interfere with the other students’ ability to concentrate. 

“School administrators attested to the young age of NMS students, the severe mental health struggles of transgender and gender-nonconforming students (including suicidal ideation), and the then-interim principal’s experience working with gender-nonconforming students who had been bullied in other districts and had harmed themselves or were hospitalized due to contemplated, or attempted, suicide,” the district wrote in court filings. 

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is weighing whether Tennessee’s ban on sex change surgeries for minors is unconstitutional discrimination.

Stay informed! Receive breaking news alerts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

Share this post!





Source link

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)
GLA NEWS
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com